fuji 56mm f1 2 or 90mm f2

Search Fuji 33mm F1 Cost. 4 aperturea full 2/3 stop faster than the Touit 32mm 4 Macro XF80mm F2 2 R APD camera Shopee กล้องและอุปกรณ์ถ่ายภาพ เลนส์ Mirrorless Lenses Fuji Lens XF 35 mm 4 R WR - $1,000 (West Vancouver) 1428 Bramwell Road QR Code Link to This Post 4 R WR - $1,000 (West Vancouver) 1428 Bramwell Road QR Code Link to This Post. Fujinon90mm F2 vs Fujinon 56mm F1.2 vs Fujinon 80mm F2.8 Macro. Photography forums endlessly battle over the merits and shortcomings of each of these three native Fuji telephoto(-ish) lenses. They all have their own subtle pros and cons, but here's the rundown: From a size perspective, the 56mm beats the 80mm beats the 90mm. Harga Dijual Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56 F1 2 R Fuji 56mm Berkualitas: Rp16.574.200: Harga: Lensa Fujifilm 56mm f1. 2 R APD: Rp18.490.000: Harga: CAMERA FUJIFILM XT3 BODY APD 56MM F1/2 R GARANSI RESMI: Rp28.970.000: Harga: KAMERA FUJIFILM XT3 BODY APD 56MM F1/2 R GARANSI RESMI: Rp28.970.000: Harga: Lens Hood Fujifilm hood lensa Fuji XF 56mm F1 2 XF 90mm F2 XF 55 200: Rp125.000 FujifilmX-T4: F1.2: https://amzn.to/2Ol1XbI90mm F2 WR: https://amzn.to/2OsVcVnViltrox 56mm Amazon: https://amzn.to/2U75kUE | http 型番AF-56mm-F1.4-XF SONY[ソニー] SEL50M28 サイズ：AF 56mm F1.4 XF-富士Xマウント用 【中古】 【並品】 ライカ エルマリートM 90mm F2.8 初期 クローム カラー：ブラック 【中古】 【並品】 ライカ エルマリートM 90mm F2.8 初期 ブラック Samyang 16 mm F2.0 Lens for Four Thirds 並行 mơ thấy người yêu có người khác. The Fujifilm platform has been the best place to be to get excellent APS-C lenses of all shapes and sizes. Fuji’s strategy has been to forego the popular 35mm full frame sensor and putting all their eggs into the APS-C basket. They’ve also moved into the Medium Format space with their GFx system, but that is a more niche, specialized space that the average photographer is essentially oblivious to. The APS-C shooters in the Canon, Nikon, and Sony space have typically had to make due with mostly lower tier lenses for APS-C, as the vast majority of the development from these companies is for full frame. Fujifilm shooters, however, have been treated to a fairly significant array of options both commercial grade and premium in and around most popular focal lengths and zoom ranges. Case in point is the lens that we are reviewing today, the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR hereafter called the XF90 for brevity, which is a premium grade 135mm equivalent telephoto lens at a very popular portrait focal length. I recently reviewed the Fujinon XF 56mm R lens, which serves a role much like an 85mm lens on a full frame 35mm system. The Fuji X-mount cameras have a crop factor of though this is not an entirely accurate figure, as Fuji actually cites the full frame equivalency of the XF90 as 137mm rather than 135mm more like I’ve seen this before when examining their tech specs, so I think this is a general observation about the X system’s crop factor. For all practical purposes, however, we have a 135mmish portrait and telephoto lens…though with a considerably smaller form factor than an equivalent lens for full frame. I’ve done this review on a Fujfilm X-T3 camera body, which means that there is no in body image stabilization. The XF90 does not have OS, unfortunately, so this is going to be a non-stabilized option unless you are using an X-H1 camera or successive bodies after this review than contain IBIS. That is a significant drawback, unfortunately, as 135mm is a long enough focal length to encounter more obvious motion blur. This combines with the reality that 26Mp is very pixel-dense for an APS-C sensor, so motion blur becomes a little more obvious here as well. I mention this because I was occasionally surprised by minor motion blur in some of my images in unexpected situations like shooting at shutter speeds of 1/200th. This is a focal length, frankly, that would have benefited from some kind of stabilization. This isn’t a problem unique to Fuji, per se, but it is part of the reason why I continue to believe that Fujifilm should expand their inclusion of IBIS to more models…including the X-T can see evidence of some motion blur here in this 1/200th shot…and I have steady hands!While I’ve lamented what wasn’t in the XF90, fortunately there are a lot of things that are there, including LM linear motors to drive autofocus, in this case 4!! of them and WR weather resistance, in the form of a gasket at the lens mount along with six other internal seals. This is a premium lens, and both of these were features missing on the XF 56mm that I recently reviewed. But is the XF90 the lens for you? Let’s explore that idea together…Prefer to watch your reviews? Here’s my two part video review series Part 1 covers build, handling, and image quality. Part 2 covers portraits, autofocus performance, video performance, and my conclusionsFollow Me Patreon My Newsletter Instagram Facebook Twitter Flickr 500pxFuji XF90 Build, Handling, and DesignThe XF90 is a very nicely made lens. It features a great form factor. We see the advantage of developing for the smaller sensor in a smaller lens when compared to full frame 135mm lenses. The lens is only x 75 x 105 mm D x L and weighs a moderate lb 540g. That’s roughly 7mm less in diameter and length and 210g less in weight than the Canon EF 135mm F2L lens. The front filter thread is a slightly uncommon 62mm; not every filter maker produces filters in this size, but there are plenty of options out there. The lens balances well on the X-T3 body I used for review. The body is primarily made of metal and has a premium feel to it. I did notice a very slight wobble in the lens mount connection to the camera. The lens has a classic semi-glass black finish to it and is completed with thorough weather sealing as already noted.There are two rings. The closest to the mount is the aperture ring. You have the option to select A and control the aperture from the camera or to physically select your preferred aperture in one-third stop detents. There is no clickless option for the aperture. It should be noted that the aperture ring is a “by-wire” system. Using the aperture ring without the lens attached to the camera and the camera powered on will accomplish nothing. I do prefer having an aperture ring on a lens as I find that it makes the photographer more intentional about aperture selection. If you don’t want to mess with it, just put it in A mode and forget about wide focus ring has nice metal ridges and moves nicely. It to is a “by-wire” ring, and input on the focus ring will be routed through the focus motor to move the elements. The damping is about right, and the ring moves smoothly and precisely. Fuji gives the option of choosing between linear and non-linear focus action, though neither quite imitates true manual focus. Non-linear will allow you to make faster focus changes if you twist the focus ring quickly, but this option lacks repeatability. You’re never quite sure exactly where you’ll end up. Selecting linear allows for more repeatability/predictability, but making major focus changes requires repeated full rotations of the ring and as a result it is difficult to make smooth focus pulls when shooting video. Bottom line is that if you want excellent manual focus, buy a manual focus XF90 has a great looking front facade with lens information on the front. Fuji makes attractive lenses with a wonderfully classic you look through the lens, you will see a lot of glass. An aperture of F2 at this focal length is nice and big!I’m far less enthused about the lens hood. It is a fairly cheap feeling plastic with interior ribs to help block stray light from bouncing around. It has a matte plastic finish that shows marks fairly easily and does not click definitely into place. It’s very easy to rotate loose. The lens hood feels like a cheap misfit on such an otherwise nicely built than this misstep I’m very happy with the build quality and handling of the XF90 Autofocus PerformanceThis section is a little complicated for me, as Fujifilm is one of three mirrorless systems that I spend a lot of time with, and as a result part of my opinions are formed by what I perceive as Fujifilm vulnerabilities when it comes to focus. It’s hard to divorce lens performance from camera performance when it comes to autofocus. Let’s start with what is clearly positive and lens specific. The XF90 has a very powerful quad linear motor focus system. This gives it a clear advantage over a lens like the 56mm in both focus speed and quality of is fast and quiet, though there can sometimes be a micro-pulse or two before focus settles. This shows up when shooting video, too, as while focus pulls are fairly quick and smooth better than most of what I’ve seen on Fuji, there is some minor pulsing before focus settles. What I do see is less obvious stepping than what I see from many Fuji lenses, so there is definitely some evidence that those quad focus motors are doing their job. The focus speed also helps this to be a better lens for stopping action than some of their other medium telephoto are few places where the lens/system fall short, though. The first is that while the lens has a great minimum focus distance and great maximum magnification figure in real-world terms, the lens is very reluctant to focus on a foreground object if focus is not already close. You can set a focus point right on an obvious foreground object, and still the lens will refuse to focus on the foreground object. I had a number of situations in my review period where I had restart the focus process multiple times or try to focus on another midpoint object to start moving focus towards the foreground. On a few occasions it required switching to manual focus and manually pulling focus in the right direction like the shot below. Very annoying. The reason that I don’t blame this entirely on the lens is that I’ve seen a press release regarding a future firmware update for the X-T3 scheduled for January 2020 that included this nugget that caught my eye, “Improving autofocus capability on a foreground subject even when there is a mixture of foreground and background subjects within a frame, causing the foreground subject to go out of focus, when shooting flowers against a busy background.” That sounds very much like what I’ve seen throughout this review, so it seems like this could be more of a camera focus problem than a lens-specific problem. This is probably also true of the second issue which, ironically, may also be addressed in that same firmware update according the press release. I find the Eye AF Pupil Detection to be somewhat less accurate than either Sony’s excellent Eye AF or Canon’s dramatically improved Eye AF after firmware on the EOS R. A lens like the XF90 sports a very shallow depth of field DOF, and I often found that the eyelashes rather than the eye itself would be in the shot below, the lens did not properly focus on the visible eyes because of the coffee mug held in the subject’s hands. I had to override focus to get what I wantedIn many situations the lens focused just fine though, and, with a little effort, I was able to get what I wanted in most all line is that while it feels like there is an effective focus system in the XF90, it is held back somewhat by some areas that Fuji still lags a bit behind some of its XF90 Image Quality BreakdownThere is one thing that Fuji does particularly well, and that is that they really do develop exceptionally good profiles for their lenses. Even RAW files arrive with embedded correction profiles, so you will only ever see an uncorrected image if you turned off the corrections in camera. The byproduct of this is that my brick wall tests are among the cleanest that I ever see, with no vignette or distortion to be seen. I’ll spare you even looking at them you can determine the lack of vignette from the sharpness samples below. It’s not unusual for 135mm lenses to have little to no distortion, but vignette is another matter. The reason I praise Fuji’s corrections as being exceptional is because they produce extremely even results with vignette correction unlike some profiles where the corners are overboosted compared to the remainder of the XF90 produces excellent center results and nearly as good corners even at F2Real world results look great, too. Check out the detail in the fibers of the rope at F2You can see excellent real-world contrast in this imageThe reason for this can be seen in another image, which shows that longitudinal chromatic aberrations are really well controlled. The high contrast transition edges on this statue show no real signs of any fringingStopping the lens down to shows an obvious uptick in contrast, with darker areas looking darker and lighter areas looking lighter and crisperThis trend continues on to F4, where resolution and contrast reach exceptional levels across the frameThe detail in the somewhat distant peninsula is exceptional and a tribute to the flexibility of a lens like this for shooting a variety of and contrast peak at with a fractional regression at F8 and a more noticeable one by F16 due to alluded to previously, the lens has an excellent reproduction ratio, though Fuji kind of obfuscates this by citing two different magnification figures. They cite the APS-C reproduction ratio as and the full frame equivalent of I find this a little silly, as you will only ever see ONE reproduction ratio, and it is the higher figure. Look at how much greater the magnification of the Fuji is than that of the Zeiss Milvus 135mm F2 and its magnification. The close-up performance of the Fuji isn’t as good as the Zeiss…but few lenses are, so I won’t hold that against it. I love having a great magnification on a lens like this; it adds so much versatility to what you can the most practical aspect of this is that you can mostly frame as tight as you like and be creative with your bokeh of the XF90 is very nice, though I wouldn’t characterize it as “magical” in the way that some exceptional telephoto portrait lenses can be the Milvus, for example. The aperture iris has seven rounded blades, though you will start to see their shape with the lens stopped down a bit. The first shot below is wide open; the second is F4, and you can definitely see a few points on the edges of the quality of the background blur at many focus distances is very nice…though there are few situations where it can look a little busyBokeh is a fairly subjective topic, so I’ll just show you some images at varying focus distances and let you be the judge yourselfI would say that in general I think the lens does a good generally find the colors from the lens quite are very nice as wellThe primary vulnerability for the XF90 like many wide aperture primes is some susceptibility to flare. You will have to be careful with either the sun in the frame or a strongly backlit subject with direct lights. The first two images show both artificial light flashlight and the sun in the frame at F2; the third image shows the resulting pattern at F11There’s definitely some veiling loss of contrast at F2 along with some generally undefined ghosting blobs. There is a more defined ghosting pattern at F11, though some might find that artistic. You’ll just either have to be careful or creative in the way that you use flare…as there will definitely be general I’m pleased with the optical performance of the lens. It’s capable of fantastic results, though I wish Eye AF was a little more accurate so that it could show this lens to its best potential. You can definitely take some magical shots with My general impressions of the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR are more positive than those of the 56mm because the latter lacks an effective autofocus system or weathersealing no LM or WR and yet is the more expensive lens of the two. It delivers a stronger wide open performance as well and was more pleasing to use because of the more modern, sophisticated quality of focus due to the quad linear motors. Both lenses are effective portrait lenses when used to their strengths. But an 85mm equivalent lens 56mm and 135mm 90mm lens are different in kind. While I generally prefer the unique look that 135mm lenses produce they can create a wonderful “cutout” effect for full frame portraits, they are also less many situations a 135mm lens or 90mm on APS-C is generally too long. In a wedding situation, for example, I have found that there were times that I couldn’t step back enough, and my framing felt crowded. So while the Fujinon 90mm is capable of producing more special images and is nicer to use, the 56mm is the more flexible tool. Which lens is better for you might depend on what else you have in your is a nice lens, however, capable of producing beautiful images that you can be proud of, and there is every reason to believe that it will perform even better as Fujifilm continues to tweak their focus systems in their cameras and hopefully adds IBIS to more bodies! I noted that on B&H Photo’s website there is an aggregate 5 star rating with 100 reviews…so people are definitely fans of this lens. This is a very useful tool and may just become the favorite portrait lens in your bag…just make sure you have enough room to use it!ProsVery nice construction complete with thorough weather sealingQuad linear motors provide quick, quiet focusNice sharpness and contrast wide openExceptional sharpness when stopped downGood colorExceptional chromatic aberration controlNice bokehConsLens hood is cheapSometimes won’t focus on foreground subjectsSomewhat flare pronePurchase the Fujinon XF 90mm F2 B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UK Amazon Germany Ebay Purchase the FUJIFilm X-T3 B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UK Amazon Germany EbayPeak Design Slide Lite Peak Design Store B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UKPeak Design Leash Strap Peak Design Store B&H Photo Amazon Amazon Canada Amazon UKBenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo Amazon Amazon UKAdobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year SubscriptionAlien Skin Exposure X4 Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everythingVisit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gearPurchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!Check me out on My Patreon Sign Up for My Newsletter Instagram Facebook Twitter Flickr 500px Google+ Use Code “DUSTINHDR” to get $10 off $15 CDN any Skylum product Luminar, Aurora, or AirMagic Keywords Fujinon, Fuji, 90mm, Fuji 90 Review, Fujinon 90mm, 90mm 2, 90 F2, 90mm F2, Fuji 90mm F2 R Review, Fujifilm X-T3, 90mm, F2, 2, FE, XF, Dustin Abbott, Review, Autofocus, Hands On, Video Test, Portrait, Video, Bokeh, Real World, Comparison, VSDISCLAIMER This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDSony FE 90mm Macro G OSSvs33 características comparadasFujifilm XF 56mm R APDSony FE 90mm Macro G OSSPor que Fujifilm XF 56mm R APD é melhor que Sony FE 90mm Macro G OSS?Abertura na distância focal mínima maior?f/ vsf/ Tem conector de metal?Abertura na distância focal máxima maior? mais leve?405gvs602gTem motor de foco silencioso embutido na lente?Distância focal mínima 34mm menor?56mmvs90mmPor que Sony FE 90mm Macro G OSS é melhor que Fujifilm XF 56mm R APD?Tem estabilizador óptico de imagem embutido?Impermeável à prova de respingos?Pode focar infinitamente?34mm melhor distância focal máxima ou teleobjetiva, com mais alcance.?90mmvs56mmTem motor de foco?Tem foco manual full-time?Distância focal mínima menor? mais lâminas de abertura?9vs7Tamron SP 90mm F2__8 Di Macro 11 VC USDTamron SP 85mm F1__8 Di VC USDSony FE 55mm F1__8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*Tamron SP 24-70mm F/ Di VC USDTamron SP 35mm Di VC USDSigma 35mm f/ DG DN ArtNikon Nikkor Z 50mm f/ SCanon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STMSigma 105mm EX DG OS HSM MacroAvaliações de usuáriosInformações geraisTipo de lenteobjetivas de distancia focal fixaobjetivas de distancia focal fixa, Teleobjetiva, MacroO tipo de dispositivo tem proteção adicional para evitar falhas causadas por poeira, pingos de chuva e respingos de conector de metal costuma ser superior a um conector de plástico, pois é mais que um peso mais baixo é melhor, já que aparelhos mais leves são mais confortáveis de manusear. Isso também é uma vantagem para eletrodomésticos, pois facilita o transporte, e para muitos outros tipos de elemento frontal não roda. Isto é importante se você usar filtros, por exemplo filtros polarizadores e gradientes têm de ser orientados de uma certa com uma capa de lente para que não tenha de a comprar separadamente. Estas são usadas para bloquear fontes de luz forte da lente, como a luz do sol por exemplo, para prevenir brilhos e reflexos da capa da lente pode ser atarrachada na lente no sentido inverso para que possa mantê-la sempre na câmera, pronta a do filtro Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APD Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony FE 90mm Macro G OSSEsta medida é importante a ser levada em conta na compra de maior distância focal máxima permite que você foque em apenas uma pequena parte do enquadramento, e oferece um ângulo de visão mais estreito que as distâncias focais mais distância focal mínima mais curta permite que você obtenha mais da cena na foto, e oferece um ângulo de visão mais amplo que as distâncias focais mais estabilização óptica de imagem utiliza sensores giroscópicos para detectar vibrações da câmera. A lente ajusta o percurso óptico de acordo com o resultado, garantindo que qualquer tipo de "motion blur" - ou mancha de movimento - seja corrigido antes do sensor capturar a menor lado da lente oferece o ângulo de visão mais amplo. Isto permite que você integre mais elementos de cena em uma fotografia baseado no formato APS-C.Na parte mais longa da lente você tem o ângulo de visão mais estreito. Isto permite-lhe apanhar uma pequena parte da cena na fotografia da mesma maneira quando faz zoom em algo baseado no formato APS-C.Uma verdadeira lente macro tem uma ampliação de 11. Isto significa que a imagem produzida é uma representação em tamanho real do objeto faixa de zoom é a razão entre os comprimentos mais longos e menor focais. A faixa de zoom mais elevado significa que a lente é mais uma maior abertura de diafragma, o sensor pode captar mais luz e ajudar a evitar imagens fora de foco, acionando maior velocidade de obturação. Isso também gera uma menor profundidade de campo, permitindo que as imagens em segundo plano sejam desfocadas e trazendo, assim, maior foco ao objeto uma abertura de diafragma mais ampla, o sensor pode captar mais luminosidade, ajudando, com maior velocidade de obturação, a evitar imagens desfocadas. Isso também cria uma baixa profundidade de campo, permitindo que você desfoque o segundo plano e foque no objeto ao número de lâminas de abertura, as lâminas arredondadas afectam a maneira como a luz entra no sensor. As lâminas arredondadas, normalmente encontradas em lentes mais caras, melhoram a aparência das áreas desfocadas. Isto permite-lhe obter um melhor e mais suave efeito bokeh nas suas abertura controla a quantidade de luz que chega ao sensor da câmera. Mais lâminas costumam indicar uma lente de melhor qualidade. Isso também permite obter melhor aspecto visual em efeitos - como o efeito "bokeh" - ao desfocar o plano de fundo, enquanto uma lente com menos lâminas costuma produzir efeitos "bokeh" mais duros e abertura menor reduz a quantidade de luz que alcança o sensor. Isso é importante em condições de claridade, em que uma abertura mais ampla poderia resultar em superexposição de imagem. Outra vantagem é que, com uma abertura menor, é possível obter maior profundidade de campo e manter toda a imagem em abertura menor reduz a quantidade de luz que alcança o sensor. Isso é importante em situações de claridade, quando que uma abertura maior poderia resultar em superexposição da imagem. Outra vantagem é que, com uma abertura menor, é possível obter maior profundidade de campo e manter toda a imagem em lentes permitem fazer foco infinito. Isso é essencial quando você quer tirar fotos que incluam objetos muito distantes, como paisagens, de modo que tudo esteja nítido e em com um motor de foco embutido podem fazer focos automáticos mesmo que a câmera não tenha o seu próprio motor de o foco manual em tempo integral, é possível mover o anel de foco enquanto estiver no modo AF foco automático. Isso significa que você pode fazer ajustes manuais sem que seja necessário alterar para o modo com motor de foco embutido focam mais rápido e silenciosamente que as lentes sem motor de foco que apenas podem utilizar o motor de foco do corpo da é a menor distância em que a lente pode focar. Uma menor distância focal mínima permite chegar mais perto do objeto fotografado, o que é especialmente importante quando se faz de nitidez Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDO resultado da nítidez da medição da DxOMark. Este resultado é baseado na medição do MTF modulation transfer function, e dá uma indicação geral da nitídez da imagem produzida pela lente. Testado com a Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte resultado da distorção cromática lateral da medição da DxOMark. A distorção cromática é um tipo de distorção que resulta na disperção de cor ao longo das bordas da imagem. Testado com a Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte DxOMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDDxOMark é uma série de testes que medem o desempenho e a qualidade de lentes e câmeras. O resultado DxOMark é a pontuação geral atribuída à lente. Testada com Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDO resultado da distorção da medição da DxOMark. A distorção na lente refere-se à variação da magnificação ao longo da imagem. Mais distorção irá resultar na gravação incorrecta de linhas rectas na imagem. Testado com a Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDO resultado de transmissão da medição da DxOMark. A transmissão refere-se à quantidade de luz que chega ao sensor através de todos os elementos de vidro de uma lente, com um TStop mais baixo a significar mais luz. Isto é importante visto que menos luz a alcançar o sensor pode requirir ISOs maiores ou velocidades de obturador mais lentas. Testado com a Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte vignette Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm XF 56mm R APDO resultado dos efeitos de vinheta da medição da DxOMark. Os efeitos de vinheta referem-se a quando o brilho de uma imagem muda a partir do centro para as bordas resultando em cantos escurecidos. O resultado de 0 é perfeito e a imagem não terá efeitos de vinheta. Testado com a Nikon D7000 ou Canon 7D. Fonte FE 70-200mm f/ GM OSS IITamron SP 90mm F2__8 Di Macro 11 VC USDSony FE 55mm F1__8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*Canon EF 85mm f/1__4L IS USMTamron SP 85mm F1__8 Di VC USDNikon AF-S Nikkor 105mm F1__4E EDCanon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USMCanon EF 70-200mm F/2__8L IS II USMSony FE 100-400mm f/4__5-5__6 GM OSSExibir tudo Go to fujifilm 90mm f2 vs 56mm - your experiences? I’m considering getting either - both are similar price, the use case for both would be portrait, with the 90mm having extra reach for zoom that may come in handy. I already own a 23mm Has anyone used both of these lens and what is your experience? The 56mm has been raved about plenty and I have used the 56mm test shots so I know how good the bokeh is also how slow the AF can be as well But what about the 90mm? Haven’t used / tried the 90mm f2 yet. Feel free to post photos taken with it as well I feel like if the 90mm doesn’t work out for me I can probably flip it for the 56mm. I also plan to take either of these while traveling as well. Thank you. Edit changed 56mm to correct aperture of Ultra-sharp images even at the maximum apertureThe optical construction comprises 11 elements in 8 groups, including three ED extra low-dispersion elements, which reduces chromatic aberrations to deliver sharp, rich images even at the widest aperture of bokehThe rounded aperture blades combined with an optical construction designed to minimize vignetting creates beautiful circular bokeh right to the edge of the image. In addition, stunning depth is possible in images thanks to the differentiation between the razor-sharp subject and the bokeh in front and behind it. ©Bert StephaniHigh-speed autofocus as fast as thanks to a newly-developed Quad Linear MotorA linear motor is fast, quiet and accurate, but here four magnets are used for higher torque. The high-speed autofocus provides a more versatile shooting experience, allowing users to quickly react to subtle changes in a subject’s facial focusing to 60cm and magnification 35mm format equivalentThe close focusing capabilities of the FUJINON XF90mmF2 R LM WR allow you to isolate key parts of a subject so you can shoot dramatic portraits or close-ups of flowers and Dust, and Freeze ResistanceThe lens features a weather- and dust-resistant structure with seven seals on the lens barrel. It can also work in temperatures as low as -10°C. This keeps the lens protected from rain, dust and splashes of water when shooting and compactThe lens weighs approx 540g, and is compact too, with a filter thread measuring just 62mm. The combined weight with the R is less than 1kg – great news for portrait photographers who want to travel light and still shoot with prime lenses for sharp images and strong bokeh.

fuji 56mm f1 2 or 90mm f2